Showing posts with label shielding RF. Show all posts
Showing posts with label shielding RF. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 24, 2015

RF Radiation Review: How Green is Your Cordless Phone?

rf radiationDo green building practices include low EMF and RF radiation exposures? The answer is usually NO. Green building practices usually do not address EMF and RF exposure and reduction methods. We have a look at the use of DECT cordless phones indoors and the exposure pattern and the desirable elements in cordless phones.


What Does Green Mean?


The term “green” is the magic word of today and is being use ubiquitously with many products and processes for the indoor environment. But want does a “green” building actually mean and entail? Do we mean:



  • Natural materials?

  • Non-toxic materials?

  • Sustainable materials?

  • Energy efficiency?

  • Recycled materials?

  • Low emission materials?

  • Low carbon foot print?


Most of us are familiar with indoor environmental quality. But does that also include low EMF and RF environments? This presentation will provide an insight on how a small common household item can have a major impact on our electromagnetic environment inside our buildings. We will review some low emitting or “green” devices which are available.


DECT Technology Has Finally Reached US Shores


Beginning last year, phones of the DECT 6.0 generation started flooding the US market. DECT is the abbreviation for Digital Enhanced Cordless Telecommunication technology. In the last decade, only Europeans used this technology and were confronted with its headaches.


The 2.4 GHz band has been used by the majority of cordless phones in the last five years. However, this band has become crowded with devices such as microwave ovens, wireless area networks (WLAN), Bluetooth, cordless phones and remote control devices. This has led to interference and performance issues so the manufacturers have moved to the 5.8GHz frequency band and the DECT 6.0 technology.


The problem with the DECT phones is that the base station is permanently sending (radiating), 24 hours a day, no matter if the system is in use or not. Indoor environmental consultants have rallied against their use for decades. There were so many outcries that it had an impact. Major European manufacturers now offer environmental safer versions, with sleep mode or reduced output in stand by mode.


Regulatory Standards


Regulatory maximum exposure limits are set by the FCC (Federal Communication Commission) for cellular providers and OSHA (Occupational Health and Safety Administration) for employee workplace safety. These regulatory exposure threshold limits are high and are solely based on the thermal heating effect of microwave radiation. However, many scientists and research publications have shown that other biological effects exist below the thermal threshold. The question the researchers and physicians are grappling with is if these effects have negative biological effects? Table 1 provides you with an overview of different international regulatory standards and recommended precautionary limits by different entities.


Table 1: International Regulatory Threshold Limits, References and Guidelines











































EntityPower Density
Regulatory – FCC/ANSI – USA (800-900 MHz)579,000 nW/cm2
Regulatory – Italy, Poland, Hungary, Bulgaria10,000 nW/cm2
Regulatory – Switzerland4,500 nW/cm2
Recommendation – Ecolog Hannover, Germany (2003)300 nW/cm2
Recommendation – Salzburg Resolution, Austria (2000)100 nW/cm2
Recommendation – STOA – EU Parliament (2001)10 nW/cm2
Average range in metropolitan areas0.5 – 2 nW/cm2
Background levels in residential areas0.05 -0.5 nW/cm2
Necessary for cellular phone reception0.0001 nW/cm2

 


The BioInitiative Report


 


About a year ago, an international working group of scientists, researchers and public health policy professionals, The BioInitiative Working Group, has released its report on electromagnetic fields (EMF) and health. It raises serious concerns about the safety of existing public limits that regulate how much EMF is allowable from power lines, cell phones, and many other sources of EMF exposure in daily life.


Public health expert and co-editor of the report, Dr. David Carpenter, Director, Institute for Health and the Environment at the University of Albany, New York asserts: “This report stands as a wake-up call that long-term exposure to some kinds of EMF may cause serious health effects. Good public health planning is needed now to prevent cancers and neurological diseases linked to exposure to power lines and other sources of EMF. We need to educate people and our decision-makers that, business as usual, is unacceptable”.


The Working Group conducted a comprehensive meta analysis of existing research, and found that a significant number of studies have shown potential effects such as increased and altered cell proliferation, influences on hormones, heart, circulatory, and nervous systems. The Working Group recommends prudent avoidance of excessive EMF’s. Table 2 outlines the suggested exposure guidelines.


Table 2: BioInitiative Report Guideline Vales




























FieldsLocationValue
EMFHomes and Schools<1 mG
EMFOther Buildings<2 mG
RFOutside<100 nW/cm²
RFInside<10 nW/cm²

You can obtain a copy of the BioInitiative Report by downloading it from the following website www.bioinitiative.org .


Historic Timeline


Let’s have a brief look at the development of phone communication equipment and the current state of the industry. We started with the wired phone lines which are disappearing rapidly. This trend is very much supported by the service providers for cost and profit considerations.





Communications devise during the author’s childhoodRotary phone with wired phone lines

 






Analog cordless phoneDigital RevolutionDigital cordless phone

Table 3 outlines the historical chronology of cordless phones, their technology, frequencies and radiation exposure effect.


Table3: Cordless Phone Technologies, Frequencies and Radiation level






































TechnologyFrequencyEmissions During Stand-by
WiredDCNo
Analog400 MHzNo
Digital915 MHzNo
ISM Band2.4 GHzYes/No
ISM Band5.8 GHzYes/No
DECT 61.9 GHzYes

The problem with many of the current cordless phones is the fact that the base station is sending signals (RF radiation) non-stop, 24 hours a day without being in use (stand-by mode). This effect raises the RF exposure to individuals in buildings significantly.


Measurements of 4 different cordless Phones


The author purchased four different types of cordless phones currently on the shelves of all major electronic warehouses. Random samples of different technology systems were selected. A spectrum analyzer (Rhode & Schwarz FSH3), a directional logarithmic periodic antenna (Schwarzbeck UKPL 9140) and a high frequency meter (Gigahertz HFW 35C) were used to conduct the testing.


Measurements were conducted at about a 3 feet distance (1 meter) from the base station and the handheld devices with the unit in use and in stand-by mode. The following table identifies the technology system, frequencies and the radiation levels.


Table 4: Measurement Results of 4 Cordless Phones






































SystemName/ModelFrequency rangePermanent transmission
Power density nW/cm²
DECT 6.0PanasonicKX-TG6311SBase: 1.9 GHzHandheld 1.9 GHz
YesNo
200200
5.8 GHz FHSSPanasonic

KX-TG4321B
Base: 5.8 GHzHandheld: 5.8 GHZ
YesNo
200200
5.8 GHz DSSVtechCS5111-2Base: 0.9 GHzHanddeld: 5.8 GHzNoNo5020
5.8 GHz analogGE25922FE1-ABase: 5.8 GHzHandheld 0.9 GHzNoNo220

The results show that the 5.8 GHz DSS and analog technologies power the base station off while in stand-by mode and create low exposures during use. Therefore, knowledge of the fields and technology systems are helpful in selecting a cordless phone to create low EMF environments, i.e. a “greener” building.


Another Phone Measurement


A different type of digital 2.4 GHz cordless phone was placed on a workstation and measurements were made at different distances from the base station with the phone not in use (stand-by mode).


Table 5: Power Density Levels of a Cordless Phone Base Station























DistancePower Density
1 foot4,050 nW/cm2
20 inches1,460 nW/cm2
3 feet360 nW/cm2
6.5 feet91 nW/cm2

Case Study


A client is concerned about the installation of a new cellular base station to be erected on the roof of a recreation center across the street from their house. The author was asked to assess the home prior to the installation. Table 6 shows the testing results and their sources.


Table 6: Measurement Results for Power Density in nW/cm2 from different Sources

















Location800-900 MHz Cellular Phone Band1.8-1.9 GHz Cellular PCS Band2.4 GHz cordless PhoneTotal
Family room0.1 nW/cm2
0.1 nW/cm2
493 nW/cm2
493.2

The 2,4 GHz was the single source creating high RF radiation in the room.


Green Ratings Systems


Most of the current DECT 6 and 5.8 GHz phones carry the EPA Energy Star rating. Obviously, this rating is not related to RF emissions. The DECT manufacturers have created two kinds of RF reduction methods for their phones for the European market.



  • “Radiation Reduced” units which power down but do not totally switch off while in stand-by mode (phone not in use)

  • “Low Radiation” units which turn the base station off when the phone is not in use


The types of phones were introduced to address customer concerns and consumer demand.


The German Federal Department for Radiation Safety (Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz) and the Radiation Protection Commission (Strahlenschutzkommission) have the following recommendation criteria for “Low Radiation” labeled phones.



  • Base station to power off or create a 100,000 fold reduction of transmission power during stand-by mode

  • Demand selective transmission power adjustments for handheld unit

  • Demand selective transmission power adjustments for base station

  • Plug for headset on handheld unit

  • Regulation of the transmission distance


Listed below is the EMF/RF rating systems for phones proposed by the German indoor environmental associations.


Wired phone without magnet in speaker (piezo electric technology)


Regular wired phones


! Analog cordless phones


!! Digital phones which power off base station in stand-by mode


!!! DECT phones which power off or provide 100,000 fold reduction at base station in stand-by mode


!!!! DECT phones which power down but by a factor of less than 100,000


!!!!! DECT phones which do not power down or turn off in stand-by mode


Unfortunately, most indoor environmental consultants in the Untied Sated are not even aware of these EMF and RF issues. With this lack of awareness, manufactures have not been confronted with a demand to provide low RF DECT phones in the US.


Conclusion


Our electromagnetic environment has significantly changed over the last decade. New technologies and the wireless world can expose us to unknown quantities of high frequency electromagnetic radiation.


Small household items, such as cordless phones, can become a significant source of RF radiation in indoor environments. The IESO is currently drafting an EMF measurement standard to be published as an ANSI Standard. Therefore, it is important that indoor environmental professionals, IAQA members and the IAQ industry be aware, familiar and able to assist their customers on EMF/RF issues. A “green” building should also be a low EMF/RF building to provide a healthy habitat. Alternative low emission technology is available to replace higher emission devices. These parameters should be part of a “green” building specification and should be evaluated when building-associated illnesses are investigated.


____________________________________


If you would like to learn more about detection and shielding of electromagnetic radiation exposure from cordless phones or other devices, call the experts at EMFRF Solutions today at 760-942-9400.


Read Additional EMF RF Articles:


Read the full story at: http://www.emfrf.com/how-green-is-your-cordless-phone-report/

Tuesday, December 23, 2014

Is An iPad Radiation Shield For RF Shielding Effective?

ipad radiation shield for rf shieldingWe have created and sewed together a pad which can be positioned under an iPad when it is placed in a person’s lap. The purpose of the iPad radiation shield is to protect the body from the wireless radio frequency (RF) and microwave radiation that’s being emitted from the iPad. Two layers of Cuprotect®, a copper wire mesh, were sewed into the fabric material.

First, we tested the shielding pad by creating a constant emitting RF source (DECT phone). The DECT phone operates in the same frequency range as an iPad. We measured the emissions from the phone at a distance of approximately a half of a foot (½ ft.) to obtain a baseline reading. Next, we placed the RF shielding pad between the phone and the measurement probe and recorded the level of emission with the shielding in place. Maximum peak values were recorded. This process was repeated twice with two different instruments. The results are reported in the table below. See images below for the results. Due to the poor lighting conditions, we apologize for the bad image quality.

Instrument UsedBeforeAfter% ReductiondB Reduction
Gigahertz 59B18 mW/m21 mW/m294.5%14 dB
Narda SRM 3006-7.11 dBm-21.85 dBm96.4%14.7 dB

The effectiveness of the Cuprotect® iPad radiation shielding pad is a 95% or 14 dB reduction.


ipad baseline of rf radiation exposure   rf radiation shielding pad between ipad and phone   radio frequency shielding pad measurement

Baseline reading                             iPad radiation shield pad in-between the DECT phone and RF meter

baseline chart of ipad rf radiation exposure   chart of ipad rf shielding pad results

Baseline reading                                       Result with iPad RF radiation shielding pad in place






EMF/RF Shielding FAQs

How Does RF Shielding Work?

Shielding materials will either absorb RF energy and transform it into heat, reflect it away, or both. They will not 100% eliminate the RF fields but significantly reduce them. These materials can be paints, meshes or foils. They are applied at a source, such as a sleeve (Cuprotect®’s Wi-Fi Shield) placed over the Wi-Fi antenna, or a building can be shielded from RF emissions from a near-by cell tower.

The shielding materials are applied to the interior or exterior of the building envelop. If shielding is desired, professional testing should be done to ascertain what type of fields are present and at what strength. It is important to choose the right shielding material and to verify that the fields have been reduced afterwards.

What are the Steps for a Professional Shielding Application?

  1. A professional survey for low-frequency electric and magnetic field and high frequency RF fields should be conducted inside the building.

  2. The EMF consultant evaluates the measured level in relationship to preventative precautionary action levels. This involves establishing benchmarks with the client.

  3. The Consultant develops a professional shielding concept identifying the areas to be shielded and the materials to be used.

  4. A licensed electrician installs a grounding plate and provides proper grounding for the shielding materials.

  5. Qualified and trained contractors install the shielding material to walls, roofs or ceilings, and potentially floors. This incorporates other components such as window panes and frames or doors into the shielding system.

  6. EMF consultant conducts verification measurements to assure that the benchmark goals have been achieved.

  7. Certification that the building is of low EMF and RF levels.

What is the Cuprotect® Shielding System?

faq3Cuprotect® is a company headquartered in Germany. The shielding material and system is now available through a distributor in the United States. Its founder, Wolfgang Kessel, developed a patented copper wire mesh RF shielding system for buildings. The system has one of the highest shielding effectiveness ratings in the industry. The Cuprotect® material is pliable, light weight, and any commercial, institution, or residential building can be retrofitted to reduce exposure to building occupants.

faq3-2We are technical consultants for the implementation of Cuprotect® shielding systems in the US. Together with Cuprotect® and Premier Roofing, we completed the first commercial radiofrequency (RF) shielding project in the San Diego. A cellular tower is installed on the roof a two-story commercial building and the building owner wanted the exposure to his tenants and their clients to be reduced. The roof was going to be replaced, so the RF shielding system was integrated into the new roofing membrane and the indoor RF levels were significantly reduced.

Cuprotect also provides a number of wireless shielding systems for wireless routers and access points. For more information visit their website at www.cuprotect.eu Cuprotect® recently completed the installation of its material at a new 1,600 Megawatt nuclear power plant in Finland. The purpose there was to protect the power plant against electromagnetic pulses from atomic bomb explosion in the thermosphere, electronic air or from ground attacks and solar flares.

Read the full story at: http://www.emfrf.com/ipad-radiation-shield-for-rf-shielding/